What is the doctrine of "originalism"?

The doctrine of "originalism" is accurately characterized as a method of constitutional interpretation that emphasizes understanding the text as it was originally written. This approach holds that the Constitution should be interpreted based on the meaning of its words and phrases at the time it was ratified. Originalists argue that adhering to the original meaning provides a stable and predictable legal framework, thus maintaining the rule of law and limiting judicial discretion.

Central to originalism is the belief that the framers of the Constitution intended specific meanings to their words and that these meanings should guide judicial interpretations today. This perspective is often contrasted with theories that view the Constitution as a living document, which can be adapted to contemporary values and societal changes. Emphasizing the text as it was understood in its original context helps originalists to argue against expansive interpretations of constitutional rights or powers that were not clearly articulated by the framers.

In summary, the doctrine of originalism is rooted in a commitment to the text as it was understood at the time of its creation, thereby ensuring that the Constitution is interpreted in a way that aligns with its original intent and meaning.