Which concept allows for information from one officer to be considered by another officer?

The concept that allows information from one officer to be considered by another officer is known as collective knowledge. This principle recognizes that while individual officers may have limited information regarding a situation, the entirety of their knowledge—as a collective body—can be utilized in making decisions, particularly in the context of law enforcement and constitutional law. It is an essential concept in legal contexts, especially when assessing probable cause for arrests or searches.

In practice, if one officer receives credible information about a suspect's activities and communicates this information to another officer, the second officer can rely on that shared knowledge to take further action, such as conducting a stop or an arrest. This helps streamline procedures and ensures that officers can act based on the totality of information available to them, rather than being solely limited by their personal knowledge.

The other concepts mentioned, such as individual knowledge, shared intuition, and common belief, do not encapsulate the principle of collective information sharing as effectively. Individual knowledge pertains only to the information one officer possesses, while shared intuition and common belief are more subjective and do not address the structured communication and validation of information among law enforcement officers. Thus, collective knowledge is the appropriate term that accurately describes this legal principle.