Which of the following is NOT a common lawsuit police officers face?

Prepare for the MPTC Constitutional Law Test with our interactive questions and detailed explanations. Enhance your knowledge and get exam-ready with confidence!

In the context of lawsuits commonly faced by police officers, the correct answer is negligent hiring because it pertains more to the actions and decisions of law enforcement agencies rather than the individual actions of police officers during the performance of their duties.

Malicious prosecution, use of force, and false arrest are legal claims directly related to the conduct of police officers while they are engaging with the public. Malicious prosecution involves wrongful legal action taken without probable cause, generally related to officers making an arrest based on insufficient evidence. Use of force pertains to the level of force that police officers apply during interactions, particularly in arrest situations, and whether that force is deemed reasonable and necessary under the circumstances. False arrest refers to unlawfully detaining someone without probable cause, which is a significant concern regarding individual officer conduct.

Negligent hiring, on the other hand, typically refers to a claim against the police department or agency itself for failing to adequately vet or train officers, which can lead to future misconduct but does not stem directly from an officer’s actions in a specific incident. This is why negligent hiring is considered less of a common lawsuit faced by individual officers compared to those arising from their direct interactions and decisions while on duty.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy