Which of the following statements is true about plain view with special devices?

The statement indicating that such devices must be used from a lawful perspective is accurate because it emphasizes the constitutional requirement that law enforcement officials must adhere to legal standards when conducting searches, even in cases of plain view. The plain view doctrine allows officers to seize evidence without a warrant if they are legally present at the location and can clearly see the evidence in question. However, the use of any special devices must also be lawful; officers cannot exceed their authority or unlawfully enhance their observation in a manner that violates the Fourth Amendment rights of individuals.

This means that while officers can use certain devices to aid their investigation, such usage must be lawful and not infringe on the rights afforded to individuals. For example, using binoculars from a vantage point where an officer has a right to observe is permissible, while using a device that invades personal privacy without a warrant would not be lawful.

In relation to the other statements, they either misinterpret the rules regarding the use of devices in law enforcement or incorrectly expand the lawful scope of what may be used in plain view situations. Thus, considering the legal principles surrounding searches and seizures, the correct answer reflects the necessity of lawful conduct in the use of special devices in the context of plain view.